Father Flynn In John Patrick Shanley’s Doubt
It is difficult to make the decision if Father Flynn is innocent or guilty. In John Patrick Shanley’s Doubt; a parable, he eclipses the truth very well. The scenes about the toy, the camping trip and the undershirt cause much confusion; causing the audience to go back and forth in their minds and doubt Father Flynn. Law says that people are innocent until proven guilty although; realistically, everyone knows that people are guilty until proven innocent. It is very possible that Father Fynn is only helping Donald, because he is less fortunate than the other students at his school; and it is also very possible that he is hurting the child by molesting him. The decision is left to the audience as the jury.
Father Flynn gave Donald Miller a toy. It was no big deal, just a little dancing ballerina that spun in circles with magnets. "That’s for you, take it." (Shanley, 2008) Donald liked the toy, and found it fascinating. Father Flynn gave him the toy, possibly because he was an underprivileged child, and did not have many toys at home. However, maybe Father Flynn gave it to him with ulterior motives. Perhaps he gave it to him just to give the boy a gift, to make Donald like him. It was a girl’s toy, and Father Flynn, being a priest, giving a little boy a toy is slightly inappropriate when the purpose of why he did this is unclear. "Every perfect gift has its origin in God- it comes from above." (James 1:17, King James Bible) Shanley leaves it completely open for interpretation. The segment is brief and vague of Father Flynn’s intent. Later on, there is a scene where the toy was stepped on and broken by the other kids at school. Father Flynn helped him pick it up and gave him a hug; comforted him. Either in a parental way, or a romantic way, was never specified.
The camping trip Father Flynn talks about with Sister Aloysuis and Sister James is only a quick idea. “Maybe take the boys on a camping trip.” “The point being?” (Shanley, 2008)Sister Alyosuis is clearly dismissing his plan altogether. Much so, because she would never permit something like that, with her traditional views on how her school was run, and her plans of keeping it that way. Father Flynn makes the suggestion maybe just for some bonding time with the children, and to be more appealing to them and their parents. Father Flynn Says to Sister Aloysuis “We should be friendlier. The children and the parents should see us as members of their family rather than emissaries from Rome." “But we are not members of their family. We are different.” (Shanley, 2005) Shanley expresses a fine line between friendly, and too friendly. Father Flynn may have suggested the trip for a chance to be alone with the boys where no one would see them if he planned on doing incongruous things with...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
Tron: Legacy a Remake of the 1982 Film1051 words - 4 pages The son of a computer programmer goes searching for his lost father in a new world. This premise is the base of Tron: Legacy, a remake of the 1982 film that became an instant science fiction classic. The original immersed it’s viewers in a new and uncommon digital world. While today this digital world may not be so new, does the film can it captivate its audience like the original did? With this being a remake of the original, is the story going...
The religious symbolisms in The Sisters, by James Joyce.1471 words - 6 pages According to Joyce himself, his intention was to "write a chapter of the moral history of [his] country and [he] chose Dublin for the scene because the city seemed to [b]e the center of paralysis". True to his goal, each of the fifteen stories composing Dubliners are tales of disappointment, darkness, captivity, frustration, and...
Literary Analysis1501 words - 6 pages Literary Analysis Author James Joyce has written many short stories which were composed to explain Dublin’s way of life. The book is known to his readers as Dubliners. His short stories have been written to help readers understand the many different feelings that were established in Dublin during a time of crisis. During this time in Dublin many changes were occurring and the city was rebuilding from the tragic potato famine and...
Personal Paralysis in Dubliners by James Joyce1968 words - 8 pages Personal Paralysis in Dubliners by James Joyce Imagine being paralyzed; unable to move freely. Most people when they think of paralization, it is connected to the physical. However, paralysis takes on more than one meaning and goes way beyond physicality. There are three definitions from Webster online: 1. Complete or partial loss of function especially when involving the motion or sensation in a part of the body 2. Loss of...
The second president of United States534 words - 2 pages The second president of United StatesJohn Adams (1735-1826) was the first vice-president and also the second president of the United States. He was born in Braintree, Massachusetts on October 19, 1735. His father was a farmer. John Adams entered Harvard...
Philosophy in "CHICAGO"1365 words - 5 pages "Razzle Dazzle them!" is a contemporary phrase the sophists would have said. It supports their views like their belief that every living thing seeks to be happy and to survive as long as possible so the only natural good is power because power increases control over the conditions of happiness and survival. The characters in Chicago crave power, fame, freedom, and identity.
The Decline of the World's IQ1390 words - 6 pages What will end the world as we know it? It could be climate change, disease, famine, or global war. If none of those come to pass there is always the truth that we are breeding our IQ into the basement. It’s called dysgeneic fertilization, and it has been happening for as long as we’ve been recording intelligence. Although this decline can be seen across the board, not everyone is affected the same way or to the same extent. With each...
Someone Who Has Served America1390 words - 6 pages My mother, Jennifer Flynn, has served and is serving America by working for the Ohio branch of Crystal Windows as an office manager. As an only child growing up, this isn’t exactly what she pictured doing for a career. Born in Fairview Park, Ohio, into a middle class family, she always wanted to be a veterinarian, or a teacher. However, things later changed as time went on. She had lived in North Olmsted until she was five years old, then moved...
In the Skin of a Lion by Michael Ondaatje1024 words - 4 pages “In the Skin of a Lion,” by Michael Ondaatje In the novel, “In the Skin of a Lion,” by Michael Ondaatje, the main character, Patrick Lewis, searches for identity and light. Without these elements, he lacks love and cannot survive the world. A passage in chapter three describes him as a lonely man that is isolated from the world around him. “Clara and Ambrose and Alice and Temelcoff and Cato- this cluster made up a drama without him. And he...
Give me Freedom or Give Death by Patric Henry1392 words - 6 pages Throughout his speech, Henry referenced a variety of Biblical themes. What are some of the most striking references Henry used? Why would these themes have resonated with his audience? This speech is timeless and would stir the patriotic spirit in many people. The message it contains can work for us today as well as it did for the colonists it was originally written for. Throughout time none of the power in this speech has...
The Multi-Faceted Theme of Poverty in "The Sisters" from Joyce's "Dubliners"1351 words - 5 pages James Joyce, the author of The Sisters in the anthology Dubliners is said to have experienced several societal and economic castes throughout his childhood life as his drunken father gradually swindled away the familys money. The experience of descent in social status allowed him to gain views and insights into many of the social classes, especially that of the impoverished. The poverty Joyce had experienced had a large impression on him,...
‘What do you do when you're not sure?’ Father Brendan Flynn (Philip Seymour Hoffman) opens his sermon with a question which underlies the plot of the entire film. Writer / director John Patrick Shanley, who also wrote the play on which the film is based, recounts the motivations behind his work:
I decided to write a play that celebrated the fact that you can never know anything for certain. I wanted to explore the idea that doubt has an infinite nature, that it allows for growth and change, whereas certainty is a dead-end.
Seeing in Black and White
The story follows Sister Aloysius Beauvier (Meryl Streep), the strict principal of St Nicholas’s School, as she investigates her suspicions about Father Flynn’s relationship with the school’s only African-American student, Donald Miller (Joseph Foster). Sister Aloysius is convinced that Father Flynn is guilty of taking advantage of a lost and lonely child, but he vehemently argues his innocence. Caught in the middle is Sister James (Amy Adams). She is a young, naïve teacher who witnesses unsettling hints at what might be going on, but remains uncertain. Sister Aloysius is willing to go to any lengths to expose Father Flynn, but she has no proof to justify her convictions. Shanley intentionally left the ending ambiguous, which resonates with the theme and title of the movie. ‘The audience would decide for themselves what their ending is,’ he explains.
The film is set in 1964, the year after the Kennedy Assassination. It was a time of change, both in society in general and in the church. Lyndon B. Johnson took the presidency after Kennedy and initiated a series of reforms known as ‘The Great Society’ programme. It was, among other things, a fight against poverty and racial injustice. Also around that time (1962-65) Pope John XXIII called a council, known as Vatican II, to re-evaluate the position of the Roman Catholic Church in modern society. Sister Aloysius and Father Flynn represent conflicting views on how the church should function. She belongs to a more conservative school of thought, perceiving the church as separate from society at large and in need of retaining that dividing line. He, on the other hand, concurs with the changes being debated at the Vatican II. He says, ‘The Church needs to change,’ and reinforces that thought by suggesting that they should try to be friendlier towards parishioners. The conflict between them leads Sister James to believe that Sister Aloysius’s opinions of Father Flynn have clouded her judgment on this matter.
Philip Seymour Hoffman explains that, ‘at heart, the story is not really about the church at all but about human beings in general. Father Flynn and Sister Aloysius could be anyone in any setting.’ The church setting throws into even starker relief an already serious situation. Father Flynn, if he were guilty, would be betraying the church that he represents. Sister Aloysius clings to a black-and-white view of reality, and in her mind there is no room for doubt and uncertainty. The hints before her convince her of Father Flynn’s guilt, and nothing he says is going to change her mind.
Father Flynn defends himself with words like ‘love’ and ‘compassion’, both of which are clearly right and are important to demonstrate. But if Sister Aloysius’s accusations are true, then Father Flynn is twisting and corrupting the definition of love. He believes that he cares about Donald more than Sister Aloysius. But true care for someone is defined by Jesus as a selfless love (John 15:13), whereas to take advantage of someone who is lonely and suffering is a selfish love. It is not healthy and it is not the way that God meant for love to be shown between two people. If Father Flynn is guilty, then he is using Donald’s pain for his own gratification, which is reprehensible in any situation, but more so here, where the perpetrator is an adult in a position of responsibility and the victim is a child whom he is supposed to be caring for.
In one scene, Sister Aloysius requests Donald’s mother (Viola Davis) to come in to the school. When she voices her suspicions about the relationship between Father Flynn and Donald, Mrs Miller’s reaction is not what she was expecting. Instead of shock at what could be happening to her son, Mrs Miller accepts the situation with resignation, but refuses to take her son out of the situation. She is aware that Donald’s sexual preferences are outside the heterosexual norm of the time. This is one of the reasons that Mr Miller beats his son and would do so again if Donald had to be removed from St Nicholas’s.
Mrs Miller contrasts Father Flynn with everyone else, seeing him as the only person who is treating Donald with any sort of kindness. So when weighing up the pros and cons, she opts to keep Donald at St Nicholas’s until he finishes in June, after which he will be able to go to a good high school and later college. Thus, unable to remove Donald from the threat of Father Flynn, Sister Aloysius determines to remove the threat of Father Flynn from Donald Miller. She pursues her goal with intensity, and succeeds in ousting Father Flynn from St Nicholas’s. But she has no hard evidence to prove her conviction to anyone besides herself. If her suspicions are unfounded then her behaviour towards Father Flynn is hardly commendable. She drives him from the parish with a threat of ruining his reputation. If Father Flynn is innocent, and she is merely misinterpreting his compassionate nature towards a boy who has been sidelined by the other students in the school, then she is living up to the impression we get of her in her first scene. Perhaps she is truly a cruel and paranoid woman who sees scandals where there are none.
Like Sister James, we find ourselves in a position between Sister Aloysius and Father Flynn, trying to sort out truth from untruth. Like her, we at first believe that Father Flynn is guilty. But as she talks to him, and he is given the opportunity to present his side of the story, we begin to doubt our certainty. The issue is confused by the introduction of the possibility that he might, after all, be innocent. It is so easy to believe the worst of people, despite the evidence being circumstantial. How often do we stop to gather all the evidence before pronouncing judgment upon someone? Is it our responsibility to pass judgment? If we see a situation where one person may be wronging another, then, yes, it is important to intervene in that situation to stop the wrongdoing from taking place and to prevent it occurring again. Where someone’s reputation is involved, however, without solid evidence that they are in fact transgressing, then perhaps a measure of grace should be observed.
In Matthew 18:5-6, Jesus outlines the right way for adults to treat children. The principles he states can be applied to the situation with Father Flynn. He first explains that it is good to welcome a child; it is good to show them compassion and love, and to care for their needs. Father Flynn asserts to Sister James that this is the extent of his relationship with Donald, and he explains it in such a way that we are able to consider the possibility that he may be telling the truth. Jesus goes on to warn against causing a child to stumble. He tells his disciples that, ‘it would be better for [them] to have a large millstone tied around [their] neck and be drowned in the depths of the sea.’ If Sister Aloysius is right, however, then Father Flynn falls into the latter category described by Jesus, and he should not be allowed to get away with it.
The Bible also provides instruction on dealing with the wrongdoing of others. Paul warns the Corinthian church that we all are guilty of sin, and that when the Lord returns he will be the one to judge each person on what they have done (1 Corinthians 4:5). Therefore Sister Aloysius, though she was right to try to protect Donald, was wrong in seeking to destroy Father Flynn. God tells people time and time again throughout the Bible that it is he who is responsible for judging every individual. Though we each have done things that hurt God, he chooses to show mercy to those who accept his son Jesus Christ as their Lord and saviour. Therefore it is not up to us to demand punishment for someone else. Though we might like to deny it, we are all guilty of rebelling against God (Romans 3:23), so none of us has the right to judge others as being more guilty than ourselves. Jesus addresses precisely the issue of judging one another (Luke 6:37-42), warning us against condemning others and encouraging forgiveness. Despite being a nun, Sister Aloysius seems to have glossed over this passage in her pursuit of what she believes to be right. Determining someone’s guilt on negligible evidence stands in stark contrast to the message that Jesus was teaching here. It’s something we all need to pay attention to.
Film title: Doubt
Keywords: Doubt, truth, certainty, conviction, evidence, belief, morality, guilt
Director: John Patrick Shanley
Screenplay: John Patrick Shanley (based on his own play)
Starring: Meryl Streep, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams, Viola Davis
Distributor: Miramax Films (USA); Walt Disney (UK)
DVD Release date: 7 April 2009 (USA); 6 Jul 2009 (UK)
Certificate: 12 December 2008 (USA); 6 February 2009 (UK) Contains theme of implied child sexual abuse
Buy from Amazon.co.uk or from Amazon.com
Related articles / study guides
© 2009 Richard Blakely
© 1997-2004 Damaris Trust
This article is reproduced from Damaris' Culturewatch website (now sadly defunct) by the kind permission of the Damaris Trust.
Opinions expressed in Culturewatch articles are those of the author, and are not necessarily representative of the views of Damaris Trust.
- 8 min read